Skip to Navigation
Skip to Content

Support PSR!

Make a difference in the challenge to confront global warming and prevent nuclear war and the development and use of nuclear weapons.

Donate Now »

Take Action

Guided by the values and expertise of medicine and public health, Physicians for Social Responsibility works to protect humanity from the gravest threats to health and survival. Right now, you can make a difference by registering your comments on the EPA's new Clean Power rule to limit carbon from existing coal-burning power plants. Just click the button to get started.

German Election Results Reflect Depth of Public Distaste for Nuclear

Posted by Morgan Pinnell on March 29, 2011

The German public sent a strong message to policymakers in state elections on Sunday as conservative stronghold Baden-Wuerttemberg went to a coalition of the Green Party and Social Democrats (SPD) as opposed to Chancellor Merkel’s ruling Christian Democrat (CDU) party, which has held the state for six decades.  A strong percentage of voters said that the Fukushima crisis figured prominently as they cast their votes.  Germany has been in a de facto nuclear moratorium for decades, but with Merkel’s 2009 election, the CDU began proposing measures to extend the life of aging German reactors and struck an increasingly pro-nuclear pose. This election can be seen as nothing less than a repudiation of the nuclear policies of the CDU. 

Now, in the wake of Fukushima and these negative election results, Merkel is hoping to make a U-turn.  She has called for a 3 month shutdown of Germany’s 17 reactors to do safety evaluations and for a plan to shift Germany to a clean, renewable energy future.  These elections may speed the pace of that proposal. 

It is interesting to watch an election where the consequences of this horrendous nuclear crisis in Japan are so visible.  Cause – Effect.  In the United States, public opinion is shifting away from new nuclear reactors and subsidies for reactors while the public and the media are learning about the aging US reactors, earthquake zones, plutonium fuel and Mark I reactor designs.  The economics of nuclear reactors are as dismal as ever (and likely to get worse in the wake of this crisis) making them less likely to be built.  Yet many elected officials have remained steadfastly wedded to the idea of a nuclear future.  The nuclear industry has spent millions in lobbying to keep things this way and is currently making the rounds at break-neck pace on the Hill. The Nuclear Energy Institute, the main lobbying group for the industry spent $3.76 million to lobby the federal government and an additional $323,000 through its PAC on a bipartisan congressional slate in the last two election cycles.  Exelon, the largest nuclear utility contributed $515K to multiple candidates in the 2010 election cycle, while competitors Entergy, Duke, and Florida Power & Light gave $400K, $475K, and $507K respectively.

President Obama insists that he’ll continue his support for new reactors in the form of $36 billion in nuclear loan guarantees. He has authorized a 90-day review of US reactors by the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC), an agency in which the public does not have much confidence. It is also implausible that a thorough review and “lessons learned” can be implemented in three months when the Japanese crisis is still ongoing and information from Japan is contradictory and unreliable.  Justifiably, Germany took Japan’s nuclear crisis as a wakeup call.  The US must do so as well.


Leave your comment

Enter this word: Change


  • Video: Nuclear Health Risks

    PSR President Dr. Bob Gould talks about the risks to public health and the global environment posed by nuclear weapons and energy. Read more »

  • Annual Report 2012

    PSR is pleased to present its 2012 Annual Report to our members and other stakeholders. Read more »

  • Fukushima Disaster: Impacts & Continuing Threats

    More than two years since the nuclear disaster began at the Fukushima Daiichi reactors, its impact is massive and widespread. It will be decades before the full scope of the impacts of this ongoing disaster is fully understood but significant health, economic, environmental and social consequences are already evident and quantifiable. Read more »

In the Spotlight

  • July 17, 2014
    Our Best Opportunity to Cut Climate Change
    We need you to take action now! Tell the EPA that its proposed rule to cut carbon pollution from power plants Is vitally important and on the right track – but can be strengthened.