Make a difference in the challenge to confront global warming and prevent nuclear war and the development and use of nuclear weapons.
Tell Congress you won’t support phony chemicals policy reform -- only real, health-protective reform.
As the nuclear industry renews its effort to persuade legislators, taxpayers and ratepayers to prop up its uneconomic industry, PSR Iowa is leading a grassroots campaign against an advanced cost recovery bill, a measure which would enable utilities to collect the capital expense for a new nuclear reactor in advance from their customers. A number of environmental, consumer protection and agricultural groups have found common ground in seeking to defeat the bill. PSR Iowa has been highlighting the dangers and risks of nuclear reactors, and pressing the Iowa legislature to eschew legislation that would put Iowans at risk.
The bill, which is being seriously considered by the Iowa House of Representatives, was supported by MidAmerican Energy. If the bill passes, MidAmerican would be allowed to recover all development costs from ratepayers and retain the advanced payments, if for any reason, a risky new nuclear reactor is not built.
The bill seems to be growing weaker and weaker these days as
the first deadline approaches for moving legislation this year. The bill passed quickly out of a subcommittee
that was heavily in favor of the legislation, but has stalled in the full
Senate committee as legislators have learned of the huge financial risks of
early cost recovery. A
recent poll by the Des Moines Register found that 77% of Iowans would
oppose early cost recovery for new nuclear development.
For more information, contact Paul Deaton, PSR Iowa.
Tell your Iowa state Senator and Representative that you oppose increased electricity bills for risky new reactors and urge them to vote against SF 390/HF 561!
More than two years since the nuclear disaster began at the Fukushima Daiichi reactors, its impact is massive and widespread. It will be decades before the full scope of the impacts of this ongoing disaster is fully understood but significant health, economic, environmental and social consequences are already evident and quantifiable. Read more »
Do you live within 50 miles of a nuclear reactor? One third of Americans do. Read more »
A government-sponsored study of childhood cancer in the proximity of German nuclear power plants (German acronym KiKK) found that children < 5 years living < 5 km from plant exhaust stacks had twice the risk for contracting leukemia as those residing > 5 km. Read more »