Join us in building a healthy environment and promoting sensible security policies. Make a donation to Student PSR today
Tell Congress you won’t support phony chemicals policy reform -- only real, health-protective reform.
As the nuclear issue heats up in Iran, one other nuclear issue has been pushed to the backburner by the Obama administration. The Comprehensive Nuclear Test Ban Treaty (CTBT), which prohibits underground nuclear testing, faced Senate ratification once in 1999 and failed. In his April speech in Prague, however, President Obama stated that, "To achieve a global ban on nuclear testing, my administration will immediately and aggressively pursue U.S. ratification of the Comprehensive Test Ban Treaty."
Unfortunately, the administration has recently stated that it does not plan to take on the fight for the CTBT until a win is virtually assured. This could be some time. The schedule for the CTBT will likely depend on ratification of a follow-on agreement to the 1991 Strategic Arms Reduction Treaty (START), which expires on December 5, 2009. It will also undoubtedly depend on the situation in Iran, as well as ongoing pushback from Senate Republicans. A senior GOP Senate aid recently noted, "If you really believe that Iran is a nuclear tipping point, what's more likely to solve that problem? Is it the U.S. ratifying CTBT or is it the U.S. finding some clever way to get Russia and China to help us deal with that problem?" Senator John Kyl (R-AZ) has also repeatedly stated his intention to derail ratification of the treaty.
Though the administration is currently hard at work compiling scientific and technical data to support its case for ratification, timing may not be on the side of the CTBT. Currently, the administration plans to wait until after the Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT) review conference, which begins next April. All the same, The Cable reports that, “if ratification seems unlikely, [the administration] could abandon the push in the near term.”
Ask the EPA to set bold limits on carbon pollution from coal-fired power plants.
How would you spend $100 billion? Over the next 10 years, the USA can cut $100 billion in wasteful nuclear weapons spending and use that money to fund vital domestic programs instead.
It takes many skills to be an effective advocate. PSR has developed a 5-part webinar series to highlight strategies in each of the following areas with real-life examples. Read more »
PSR tabling materials for outreach at students and informational fairs Read more »
SPSR talking points on the use of antibiotics in animal agriculture. Read more »