Your membership supports PSR's work to reduce global warming, eliminate toxics in our environment and abolish nuclear weapons. YOU make our work possible. Thank you.
Tell the EPA to ban the use of methylene chloride and NMP in commercial and consumer paint strippers. Let’s protect workers and consumers from these harmful chemicals and switch to safer alternatives.
FY2010 Budget: EPA Receives Much-Needed Funding Increase
May 13, 2009
On May 12, 2009, EPA Administrator Lisa Jackson testified before the Senate Environment and Public Works committee regarding the President’s FY10 budget proposal. The President has requested $10.5 billion for the EPA, representing a 37 percent increase greater than the FY09 budget and the highest level ever for the EPA. After severely decreased budgets during the previous administration, PSR supports the President’s request and is encouraged by the apparent dedication by the administration to carry out EPA’s mission to protect human health and the environment from pollution.
Some of the major environmental protection priorities addressed in the budget of particular interest to PSR:
- Funding to combat global warming, including funding a greenhouse gas emissions inventory and cap and trade programs.
- An increase in funding to fund a toxics program to screen, assess hazard level of and reduce the chemical risks on more than 6,750 organic chemicals in the U.S.
- An increase in the Computational Toxicology Research funding to provide detailed hazard assessment profiles on thousands of chemicals of concern and human exposure potential.
- A $5 million increase to enable the Integrated Risk Information System (IRIS) to increase assessment production and reduce a backlog of assessments for chemicals previously identified as a priority.
- Includes $3.3 million for air toxics research, to study their effects of human health, and to support the development and implementation of state, local and tribal air quality plans. The budget also includes funding of support for states to monitor air quality outside of select schools, risk assessment tools, and increased staffing in EPA’s regional office to work on air quality issues.
- An increase in funding for research and development programs, solidifying the administration’s commitment to scientific integrity at the agency.
For the full content of Administrator Jackson’s testimony, click here.
Comments Leave a Comment
Too Dirty, Too Dangerous
PSR's report, Too Dirty, Too Dangerous: Why Health Professionals Reject Methane, based on summaries of recent medical and scientific studies, clearly conveys the health threats that accompany use of methane as a fuel. Read more »
Climate Change and Famine
Climate change is already threatening the Earth’s ability to produce food. These effects are expected to worsen as climate change worsens. Read more »
Congressional Review Act Handout
Congress is poised to use the CRA to dismantle Clean Air and Clean Water protections. CRA allows Congress by majority vote in both chambers (with limited debate and no opportunity for a filibuster) to void recently issued rules-resulting in communities losing dozens of health, safety and environmental protections. Read more »
In the Spotlight
November 30, 2016
Eating for Climate and Health
PSR's new PowerPoint presentation on how climate change impacts food production, and agriculture's contribution to climate change.