Skip to Navigation
Skip to Content

Support PSR!

Make a difference in the challenge to confront global warming and prevent nuclear war and the development and use of nuclear weapons.

Donate Now »

Take Action

Please voice your support for a strong, health-protective rule by submitting your comment to the EPA today.

Coal: not clean x 2

Posted by Barbara Gottlieb on December 10, 2008

Have you seen the coal industry's advertising blitz about "clean coal"?   Our colleagues in the environmental movement have responded with a media campaign of their own.  Their first TV ad, a tongue-in-cheek spoof, purports to show us a "state of the art clean coal facility."  What's there?  A windswept terrain of sand, stone and scrub.  In short, clean coal technology doesn't exist.  Neither does "clean" coal.

The ad identifies coal combustion as one of the leading causes of global warming.  Coal-fired plants add huge amounts of carbon dioxide to the atmosphere, increasing global warming and the potential for massive public health emergencies from storms, flooding, drought, and vector-borne disease. 

Yet grave as that is, it is only part of coal's threat to health. 

Coal combustion spews lethal emissions that contribute to critical health problems and premature death:

  • Particulate matter from burning coal has been linked to heart attacks, respiratory disease and cancer.
  • Sulfur dioxide, even at the levels permitted by environmental legislation, can cause permanent and irreversible damage to the lungs. 
  • The nitrogen oxides and volatile organic compounds that coal emits contribute to smog, which aggravates asthma, chronic lung diseases, and pre-existing heart diseases. 
  • And the mercury emitted from coal-burning plants leaves 600,000 infants each year born at risk for mental retardation, autism, or other brain development defects due to their mothers' consumption of mercury-contaminated fish.

Technologies to capture and store carbon dioxide on an industrial scale are estimated to be ten years down the pike.  Yet even if they were available, coal would still remain unacceptably dirty and dangerous.  So we'll say again, as we have said before: 

Clean coal is a dirty lie.

 

Comments

Leave your comment

Name
Comment
Enter this word: Change

Action Alerts

More action alerts»

Resources

  • Annual Report 2012

    PSR is pleased to present its 2012 Annual Report to our members and other stakeholders. Read more »

  • Toxic Chemicals in Our Food System

    What chemicals are in the food we eat? Chemicals are used in every step of the process that puts food on our table: production, harvesting, processing, packing, transport, marketing and consumption and can be dangerous to our health. Read more »

  • Fracking: Harm on the Farm

    Chemical exposures that harm farm animals and wild animals raise concern about health risks for people living near fracking sites, as the animals use the same water and breathe the same air as humans. Another, indirect concern for human health also exists: in multiple known cases of chemical exposure, cows continued to produce dairy and meat for human consumption, although it remained untested for chemical contaminants. Read more »

In the Spotlight

  • July 17, 2014
    Our Best Opportunity to Cut Climate Change
    We need you to take action now! Tell the EPA that its proposed rule to cut carbon pollution from power plants Is vitally important and on the right track – but can be strengthened.