Skip to Navigation
Skip to Content

Support PSR!

Make a difference in the challenge to confront global warming and prevent nuclear war and the development and use of nuclear weapons.

Donate Now »

Take Action

Please ask your senators to cosponsor Sen. Franken's bill to challenge the trillion dollar nuclear weapons buildup.

PSR calls on EPA to tighten proposed standards on smog

Posted by Barbara Gottlieb on February 16, 2010

 

It was my pleasure to present PSR’s comments before the Environmental Protection Agency recently, urging the EPA to tighten air quality standards for ground-level ozone, or smog.

Speaking at a public hearing in Arlington, VA, I joined the American Lung Association, Sierra Club and other clean air advocates in highlighting the damage to health that smog inflicts on large swaths of the U.S. population.

On the other side were industry spokespeople who cited the inconveniences and costs that more stringent pollution limits would impose on their businesses.

Those claims undoubtedly have some validity.  But they shrink when viewed in the context of the costs to health that respiratory diseases already impose on Americans:

• 100,000 deaths annually
• 4 million hospital discharges
• 14 million emergency room visits
• 112 million visits to ambulatory care facilities
• perhaps as many as 700 million person-days where activity was restricted due to causes attributable to the lower respiratory system. 

Interestingly, I seemed to be the only speaker telling the EPA that its proposed standards were not strict enough.  PSR’s review of the scientific studies cited by the EPA suggested that they were endorsing an ozone standard not stringent enough to protect vulnerable populations. 

“Vulnerable populations” include children, especially children with asthma; adults with chronic respiratory or cardiovascular diseases, and populations with genetic susceptibilities to ozone.  Hardly an insignificant portion of our population!

Concerned about ozone’s impact on health?  Know something about the impacts of ozone?  Share your knowledge and concerns with the EPA.  They are receiving public comments online, through March 22.
 

Comments

Russell Novkov said ..

It is critical that the EPA tightens smog to reduce air pollution.

March 9, 2010
Geri Aird said ..

As one who has breathing problems, I support the PSR position of stricter standards on ground-level ozone levels, as presented recently to the EPA.

March 9, 2010

Leave your comment

Name
Comment
Enter this word: Change

Action Alerts

More action alerts»

Resources

  • Health Impacts of Natural Gas Infrastructure

    Fracked natural gas contaminates air and water where it is extracted, then pipelines transport gas-related pollutants for hundreds of miles. Distant communities may be exposed to toxic air pollutants, dangerous particulates, and radioactive materials. All of us are endangered as methane leaks into the atmosphere. Read more »

  • Natural Gas: Not a healthy or climate-protective solution for the Clean Power Plan

    Building natural gas plants to replace coal-fired power is not a solution to the climate crisis; it merely replaces one fossil fuel with another. Read more »

  • Death by Degrees

    The sign of Global Warming are already here. “Death by Degrees” is a series of reports looking at the damaging health effects of global warming by states or regions within the United States. We encourage you to learn about the public health threats global warming poses in your state/ region and contact your elected officials to support climate policies that reduce our reliance on dirty fossil fuels and supports energy efficiency, conservation and clean renewable energy production. Read more »

In the Spotlight

  • November 30, 2016
    Eating for Climate and Health
    PSR's new PowerPoint presentation on how climate change impacts food production, and agriculture's contribution to climate change.