Skip to Navigation
Skip to Content

Support PSR!

Your membership supports PSR's work to reduce global warming, eliminate toxics in our environment and abolish nuclear weapons. YOU make our work possible. Thank you.

Donate Now »

Take Action

Tell the EPA to ban the use of methylene chloride and NMP in commercial and consumer paint strippers. Let’s protect workers and consumers from these harmful chemicals and switch to safer alternatives.

Regulating killer particulate matter

Posted by Barbara Gottlieb on March 1, 2010

Last Friday I again testified before the EPA on the health impacts of air quality.  This time the subject was particulate matter.  Once again, I was encouraging the EPA to follow through on a positive step it has proposed.

"Particulate matter" consists of extremely small airborne particles, generated primarily from coal combustion, oil combustion, and traffic.  They’re distinguished by size as coarse particulates, with a diameter of 2.5-10 microns (PM10), and fine particulate, with a diameter less than 2.5 microns (PM 2.5).  We’re talking extremely small.  By way of comparison, a human hair is about 70 microns in diameter. 

Back in 1997 the EPA proposed standards for PM 2.5 emission levels, and strengthened those standards in 2006.  Unfortunately, EPA undermined its own rules by allowing coal and industrial plants to measure coarse particulates, or PM10, as a surrogate for PM 2.5. 

They are now proposing to end those practices and return to a requirement to measure – and limit – PM 2.5.

That’s a very important thing to do.  The health impacts of PM 2.5 are much greater than the impacts of PM 10, due to differences in the ways and the extent to which the smaller 2.5 particles penetrate the human body.  

Small particles of particulate matter travel deep into the lungs, reaching the alveoli, the tiny air bags in the lungs whose thin walls allow oxygen to enter the blood.  There, the particles that are 2.5 microns or less in diameter can pass through the alveoli walls and travel through the blood stream to other organs.  As a result, not only the respiratory system but also the cardiovascular system and the neurological system are exposed to damage.

And it does cause damage! Among PM 2.5's impacts on the human body are: 

Respiratory: 

  • PM 2.5 can stunt lung development, leading to reduced lung function in children.  This reduction of function often precedes the subsequent development of other pulmonary diseases.
  • Exposure to PM 2.5 is associated with the exacerbation of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, the fourth leading cause of mortality in the U.S.
  • Exposure to PM 2.5 is also correlated with the development of and mortality from lung cancer.

Neurological:

  • Higher ambient levels of PM 2.5 have been correlated with increased hospital admission rates for cerebrovascular disease, or stroke.

Cardiovascular: 

  • Higher ambient levels of PM 2.5 increase the probability of hospital admission for acute myocardial infarction  (heart attack), ischemic heart diseases, congestive heart failure, and potentially fatal cardiac rhythm disturbances.

Sometimes the increases in the rates of increased incidence appear small, on the order of a single percent.  But when you consider the large number of cases of heart disease, even a small percentage uptick translates into a very large effect when measured in terms of total hospital admissions, patient morbidity and mortality, and the cost of health care, time lost from school and work, and simple human suffering.

In short, the danger to health posed by PM 2.5 is widespread, severe, and costly.  I was glad to get the opportunity to tell that to the EPA.

If you agree that the EPA, to protect human health, should end the PM 10 “surrogate” policy and regulate PM 2.5, please post your comments online.  You have until March 15. 

Comments

Leave your comment

Name
Comment
Enter this word: Change

Action Alerts

  • Tell EPA: Ban toxic chemicals from paint strippers

    Tell the EPA to ban the use of methylene chloride and NMP in commercial and consumer paint strippers. Let’s protect workers and consumers from these harmful chemicals and switch to safer alternatives.

  • It's time to put our health before polluter profits

    Climate change is endangering us now, harming public health and causing damage to our communities from extreme weather events. Tell your senators that rolling back methane pollution standards, a key step in our fight against climate change, is unacceptable!

More action alerts»

Resources

  • Too Dirty, Too Dangerous

    PSR's report, Too Dirty, Too Dangerous: Why Health Professionals Reject Methane, based on summaries of recent medical and scientific studies, clearly conveys the health threats that accompany use of methane as a fuel. Read more »

  • Climate Change and Famine

    Climate change is already threatening the Earth’s ability to produce food. These effects are expected to worsen as climate change worsens. Read more »

  • Congressional Review Act Handout

    Congress is poised to use the CRA to dismantle Clean Air and Clean Water protections. CRA allows Congress by majority vote in both chambers (with limited debate and no opportunity for a filibuster) to void recently issued rules-resulting in communities losing dozens of health, safety and environmental protections. Read more »

In the Spotlight

  • November 30, 2016
    Eating for Climate and Health
    PSR's new PowerPoint presentation on how climate change impacts food production, and agriculture's contribution to climate change.