Skip to Navigation
Skip to Content
Check back each month for new topics and responses

Share EmailFacebookTwitter
Share on Facebook
Cancel
Share on MySpace
Cancel
Share on Twitter
A short URL will be added to the end of your Tweet.

Cancel
Share on LinkedIn
Cancel

About

Welcome to PSR's Environmental Health Policy Institute, where we ask questions -- then we ask the experts to answer them. Join us as physicians, health professionals, and environmental health experts share their ideas, inspiration, and analysis about toxic chemicals and environmental health policy.

Topics

More Topics »

Asleep at the Wheel of the War on Cancer

By Samuel S. Epstein, MD

This essay is in response to: What are we learning about the relationship between environmental toxicants and cancer? How should our regulatory system respond to this information?

Last year, President Obama boldly pledged to reform the national health care system. Central to this reform is containing health care costs which are soaring at about 6% each year. Clearly, this is not possible without a plan to prevent us from getting cancer in the first place.

The cancer epidemic strikes one in three of us and takes the life of one in four. This year, 1.5 million of us will be diagnosed with cancer, of whom, 560,000 people will die. After four decades of losing the cancer war, which President Nixon declared in December 1971, we are taking minimal, if any, action to protect us from this menace.

While research on cancer prevention and treatment of cancer is predominantly the responsibility of the National Cancer Institute (NCI), other federal agencies, FDA, OSHA, EPA, and CPSC are also involved. Unfortunately, such action is minimal and uncoordinated.

Cancer is not only one of the most costly and sometimes deadly, it is also one of the most preventable. The connection between losing the cancer war and the need to control costs through prevention should be clear.

Based on recent NIH estimates, the total annual costs of cancer are $219 billion a year. The annual costs of diagnosis and treatment are $89 billion; those of premature death are about $112 billion; and those costs of lost productivity are estimated at $18 billion. The human costs are surely of far greater magnitude.

Smoking remains the single largest cause of cancer, particularly lung cancer. While lung cancer incidence rates in men have declined by 20% over the past three decades, rates in women increased by 111%. As importantly, non-smoking cancers -- due to known chemical and physical carcinogens -- have increased substantially since 1975. Some of the more startling realities in the failure to prevent cancer are illustrated by their soaring rates of increase since 1975. These include:

  • Malignant melanoma of the skin in adults is increasing by 168% due to the use of sunscreens in childhood that fail to block long wave ultraviolet light;
  • Thyroid cancer is increasing by 124% due in large part to ionizing radiation;
  • Non-Hodgkin's lymphoma is increasing 76% due mostly to phenoxy herbicides and phenylenediamine hair dyes;
  • Testicular cancer is increasing by 49% due to pesticides; hormonal ingredients in cosmetics and personal care products; and estrogen residues in meat;
  • Childhood leukemia is increasing by 55% due to ionizing radiation; domestic pesticides; nitrite preservatives in meats, particularly hot dogs; and parental exposures to occupational carcinogens;
  • Ovary cancer (mortality) for women over the age of 65 has increased by 47% in African American women and 13% in Caucasian women due to genital use of talc powder;
  • Breast cancer is increasing 17% due to a wide range of factors. These include: birth control pills; estrogen replacement therapy; toxic hormonal ingredients in cosmetics and personal care products; diagnostic radiation; and routine premenopausal mammography, with a cumulative breast dose exposure of up to about five rads over ten years.

A wide range of evidence has related a wide range of cancers to environmental exposures to carcinogens, including formaldehyde, chlorinated organic pesticides, and organic solvents. The increasing incidence of lung cancers has also been related to preventable occupational exposures to asbestos, silica, chromium VI, formaldehyde, methylene chloride, benzene, and ethylene oxide.

The NCI is the primary federal agency ostensibly devoted exclusively to fighting cancer. Paradoxically, the escalating incidence of cancer over the last thirty years parallels its sharply escalating annual budget - from $690 million in 1975 to $5.2 billion this year. Of this a mere $131 million -- or 2.5%% -- is allocated to NCI's mission on Prevention and Early Detection.

However, in spite of well-documented evidence relating the escalating incidence of cancer to a wide range of avoidable carcinogenic exposures, the NCI remains "asleep at the wheel," and has stubbornly refused to devote resources let alone attention to prevention.

The NCI has ignored proddings from Congress and independent scientific experts to develop a comprehensive registry of carcinogens. Worse still, the NCI claims that most cancers are due to unhealthy behavior, such as smoking, poor nutrition, inactivity, obesity, and overexposure to sunlight, and that a mere 6% are attributable to environmental and occupational exposures. These claims are despite overwhelming evidence to the contrary.

Furthermore, the NCI has touted the imminent success of new cancer treatments--promises that have seldom been borne out. For instance, in 2004, Nobel Laureate Leland Hartwell, President of the Fred Hutchinson Cancer Control Center, warned that Congress and the public are paying NCI $4.7 billion a year, most of which is spent on "promoting ineffective drugs" for terminal disease.

Congress now has an epochal opportunity to reform our health care system and prevent cancer from occurring in the first place. By taking some simple steps to achieve this, Congress should enact specific legislative reforms to the 1971 National Cancer Act:

  • Declare that it is the national policy to reduce carcinogenic exposures to confirmed or suspected carcinogens by at least half during the next decade.
  • Allocate at least 40% of the NCI budget to explicit prevention-related programs for FY 2011, and 50% by FY 2014.
  • Mandate the annual publication of a comprehensive register of carcinogens. This will provide federal, state, and local governments, as well as the public, with comprehensive information on carcinogens in the workplace, environment, and consumer products so that necessary preventive action can be promptly undertaken.
  • Create a Deputy Director for Cancer Prevention of the NCI who, together with the administrators of EPA, OSHA, CPSC, FDA, and other relevant agencies, shall report to Congress annually on steps needed during the next decade, under existing regulatory authority, to reduce the prevalence of future preventable cancers.
  • The NCI shall meet regularly with the administrators of EPA, OSHA, CPSC, and FDA to identify opportunities to reduce exposures to carcinogens in the environment, the workplace, pharmaceuticals, and consumer products -- food, household products, and cosmetics and personal care products.

These steps alone will not win the war against cancer, but they will be critical in redirecting a failing war on cancer that can best be described as one of the most notorious public health failures of the 20th century. Cancer prevention is a critical public policy area in which reform is long overdue.

Comments

Marion Sampson said ..

Is formaldehyde what is used to preserve bodies at funeral homes- I have noticed over the last two years that the cabbage family and sweet potato smells (before cooking) like formaldehyde, like the smell of a funeral home. Are they now permitted to spray these vegetables after harvest to preserve them?

January 27, 2014
Pat G said ..

An article is needed to point out the catastrophic defanging and shackling of the EPA, FDA, etc, and all other watchdogs that have in the past protected us from industrial carcinogens. One needs only look at the substantial loss of life and massive destruction of the environment caused by off-shore drilling (BP), Mountaintop-Removal coal mining (Massey Coal), and proliferation of cancers in and around fracking communities to realize the observable results of corporate assaults on our governmental agencies. Nuclear power plants are an accident waiting to happen. In the last 10 years, our nation has gone backwards in environmental protections for Americans and has made us resemble more and more third-world countries. We should be embarrassed and alarmed that we have allowed our government to be subverted by the greed and callousness of corporate power.

June 19, 2011
Rich Murray said ..

Aspartame is indeed 11% methanol (wood alcohol), which the human body quickly turns into formaldehyde via the ADH enzyme, concentrated in many tissues: liver, kidney, brain, retina, skin, prostate, breast, womb, muscle -- forming cumulative micro lesions and a wide variety of symptoms. Other methanol (formaldehyde) sources include wood and tobacco smoke, dark wines and liquors, fruits and vegetables heated in sealed metal and glass containers, and aspartame, as well as a variety of products ranging from medicines to new carpet, drapes, and furniture to mobile homes. People vary enormously in individual vulnerability. Folic acid can protect many people. See while-science-sleeps.com/references/pdf/586 Prof. (retired) Woodrow C. Monte. Amid health fears, Diet Coke sweetener [aspartame] in safety spotlight, Sean Poulter, UK Daily Mail 2011.05.27, 141 comments: Rich Murray 2011.05.30 http://rmforall.blogspot.com/2011_05_01_archive.htm Monday, May 30, 2011 [ at end of each long page, click on Older Posts ] http://groups.yahoo.com/group/aspartameNM/message/1625 [ you may have to Copy and Paste URLs into your browser ]

June 17, 2011
Dorothy Peterson said ..

I so appreciate your call to PREVENT cancer by reducing exposure and then followup for checking on it. I hope there will be many to help to implement your ideas. Thank you.

June 16, 2011
Zyxomma said ..

I eat organic, vegan food, drink purified, blessed water, and use cosmetics, hair care, and body care products without endocrine disruptors. This plan sounds like a great way to start.

June 16, 2011

Leave your comment

Name
Comment
Enter this word: Change