Skip to Navigation
Skip to Content
Share this page


Welcome to PSR's Environmental Health Policy Institute, where we ask questions -- then we ask the experts to answer them. Join us as physicians, health professionals, and environmental health experts share their ideas, inspiration, and analysis about toxic chemicals and environmental health policy.


More Topics »

Parental Pesticide Exposure Linked to Childhood Cancer

Posted on June 24, 2014

By Jennifer Runkle, PhD, MSPH

Research linking pesticide exposure and cancer in children is now substantiating public concern over pesticide exposure in children. The American Academy of Pediatrics recently released a report suggesting pesticides may induce chronic health complications in children, including cancer.1 Though cancer in children is a rare event, incidence rates are on the rise.2 With the exception of a few known risk factors, the etiology of this complex disease is largely unknown. Numerous studies now provide evidence that parental exposure to pesticides is an important environmental risk factor in the development of cancer in children.

Pesticides are a heterogeneous class of chemicals conveniently classified as herbicides, insecticides, fungicides, and rodenticides based on the target pests. In children, cancer cases have been indiscriminately associated with all pesticide classes. Recent meta-analytic findings demonstrate a more than two-fold excess risk of child leukemia among mothers occupationally exposed to insecticides and herbicides during pregnancy.3,4 Even more surprising are studies indicating a 50% increase in childhood leukemia risk following routine maternal pesticide use in the home or garden.5  Paternal occupational exposure to herbicides, fungicides and insecticides has also been positively associated with risk of child brain tumors.5,6 The evidence now extends beyond workplace exposures and highlights the importance of reducing household pesticide exposure as an important risk factor.

Vulnerable Farmworkers and their Children as Sentinel Indicators

An estimated 2 billion men and women working in agriculture are regularly exposed to the toxic agrochemicals used on the global food supply.7 It is now well-established that vulnerable, low-income farmworker populations are disproportionately affected by acute- and chronic-pesticide related illnesses. Annual surveillance has documented as many as 25 million cases of unintentional pesticide poisoning occurring in farmworkers worldwide.8 Despite U.S. federally required pre-market testing in animals, evidence from prospective studies has consistently demonstrated excess risks for breast cancer, leukemia, multiple myeloma, non-Hodgkin lymphoma and prostate cancer in licensed pesticide applicators and their family members.9 While research shows pesticide-associated cancers are higher in farmworkers, data are suggestive that cancer is higher in farmworker children. A number of predisposing events occurring prior to conception, in utero, and/or after birth likely result in greater susceptibility to pesticide-related cancer in farmworker children.

Pesticide exposure levels in reproductive-age farmworkers consistently exceed levels in the general population. Prior studies have suggested that preconception levels of exposure may lead to maternal or paternal germ-cell mutations.9 Recent evidence indicates prenatal exposure to toxic pesticides is a potential initiator of cancer-promoting events in utero. In addition to important behavioral, dietary, and physiological differences, young farmworker children encounter higher levels of pesticides through parent take-home exposure as well as from household contamination.  Higher levels of organophosphates (OP), a probable human carcinogen, have been detected in the urine of farmworkers’ children.10 Perhaps equally alarming are documented cases of hospital-acquired OP poisoning in medical personnel not wearing appropriate protective equipment while caring for patients contaminated with OP.11 Though extreme, these incidences further emphasize the vulnerability of farmworker children, who encounter secondhand pesticide exposure repeatedly.

Overburdened farmworkers and their families provide sentinel notification of the devastating human health effects of highly exposed persons. However, research now shows that all exposures, even low-level exposures, are associated with some level of health risks.  A recent NAS report underlined “background” low-level exposure to environmental chemicals may exact as much or more harm than higher levels of these toxic, cancer-causing chemicals.12

Background exposure linked to Chronic Health Effects

All persons worldwide are exposed to ubiquitous and sometimes biologically persistent toxins in the air, soil, and water. A classic example of the persistence of these chemicals is DDT, one of the first widely used agricultural insecticides in the 1950s. Although DDT was banned by the USEPA in 1972, detectable levels are still present in the blood, placenta, and breast milk of the contemporary US population.13,14 According to the President’s Cancer Panel, pre-adolescent girls exposed to DDT were five times more likely to develop breast cancer later in life.15  Mouse models and cell studies have also shown that low levels of exposure not only promote chronic disease development among those directly exposed, but may also be involved in the promotion of adult onset disease transgenerationally.16

As many as 70 widely used pesticides are currently classified as probable or possible human carcinogens, with countless other high-volume chemicals waiting further testing.17 Even more importantly, pesticides with known carcinogenic activity are being replaced with alternative pesticides having cancer-causing potential. For example, residential and agricultural use of organophosphates, a large subclass of pesticides with known carcinogenicity, has largely been replaced by cypermethrin. Consequently, based on limited evidence from animal studies, cypermethrin is also considered a possible human carcinogen by the USEPA.18

Critical Role of Health Providers

Compelling scientific evidence revealing that preconception and prenatal exposure to toxic environmental chemicals can have a profound and lasting effect on health across the life-span is rapidly gaining momentum in the consumer, legislative and even the health care arenas. In 2013, the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists released a Committee Opinion calling the attention of all reproductive and health specialists to the reduction of exposure to toxic environmental agents as a critical area of intervention.19 Protecting farmworker children from childhood cancers and other pesticide-related health effects, as well as protecting the general public, requires dedicated action to reduce parental exposure to pesticides.

Medical providers are uniquely poised to have a significant impact in diminishing these exposures through anticipatory guidance at multiple stages, including the ever-critical preconception, prenatal and postnatal periods. For health providers, steps toward action require: 1) becoming more knowledgeable about how environmental exposures can influence adverse reproductive and developmental health outcomes;20,21  2) obtaining a detailed environmental and occupational exposure history;18, 22 3) encouraging farmworkers and other patient populations (men and women of reproductive age and pregnant women) to discuss possible sources of contact with pesticides;23 4) understanding potential exposures for vulnerable patient populations in the geographic service area; 5) connecting with a local Pediatric Environmental Health Specialty Unit;24 and 6) reporting pesticide-related illness to the appropriate agency.18,25

1.         Roberts JR, Karr CJ. Pesticide exposure in children. Pediatrics. Dec 2012;130(6):e1765-1788.

2.         Buka I, Koranteng S, Osornio Vargas AR. Trends in childhood cancer incidence: review of environmental linkages. Pediatric clinics of North America. Feb 2007;54(1):177-203, x.

3.         Van Maele-Fabry G, Lantin AC, Hoet P, Lison D. Childhood leukaemia and parental occupational exposure to pesticides: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Cancer causes & control : CCC. Jun 2010;21(6):787-809.

4.         Wigle DT, Turner MC, Krewski D. A systematic review and meta-analysis of childhood leukemia and parental occupational pesticide exposure. Environmental health perspectives. Oct 2009;117(10):1505-1513.

5.         Vinson F, Merhi M, Baldi I, Raynal H, Gamet-Payrastre L. Exposure to pesticides and risk of childhood cancer: a meta-analysis of recent epidemiological studies. Occupational and environmental medicine. Sep 2011;68(9):694-702.

6.         Shim YK, Mlynarek SP, van Wijngaarden E. Parental exposure to pesticides and childhood brain cancer: U.S. Atlantic coast childhood brain cancer study. Environmental health perspectives. Jun 2009;117(6):1002-1006.

7.         Repetto R, Baliga S. Trends and patterns of pesticide use: In Pesticides and the immune system; Public Health Risks. 1996.

8.         Alavanja MC, Hoppin JA, Kamel F. Health effects of chronic pesticide exposure: cancer and neurotoxicity. Annual review of public health. 2004;25:155-197.

9.         Alavanja MC, Ross MK, Bonner MR. Increased cancer burden among pesticide applicators and others due to pesticide exposure. CA: a cancer journal for clinicians. Mar-Apr 2013;63(2):120-142.

10.       Thompson B, Griffith WC, Barr DB, Coronado GD, Vigoren EM, Faustman EM. Variability in the take-home pathway: Farmworkers and non-farmworkers and their children. Journal of exposure science & environmental epidemiology. Mar 5 2014.

11.       Geller RJ, Singleton KL, Tarantino ML, et al; Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Nosocomial poisoning associated with emergency department treatment of organophosphate toxicity—Georgia, 2000. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2001;49(51-52):1156–1158

12.       National research Council of the National academies. board on environmental Studies and Toxicology. board on environmental Studies and Toxicology. Committee on Improving risk analysis approaches by the USEPA. Science and Decisions: Advancing Risk Assessment. Washington D.C.: National academies Press, 2009, p. 158. ISbN: 0-309- 12047-

13.       DDT Fact Sheet. CDC.

14.       Smith D. Worldwide trends in DDT levels in human breast milk. International Journal of Epidemiology. April 1, 1999 1999;28(2):179-188.

15.       Reducing Environmental Cancer Risk: What We Can Do Now. President's Cancer Panel.

16.       Skinner MK, Manikkam M, Tracey R, Guerrero-Bosagna C, Haque M, Nilsson EE. Ancestral dichlorodiphenyltrichloroethane (DDT) exposure promotes epigenetic transgenerational inheritance of obesity. BMC Medicine. 2013;11:228.

17.       Chemicals Evaluated for Carcinogenic Potential. U.S. EPA.

18.       Cypermethrin Fact Sheet. National Pesticide Information Center.

19.       Exposure to toxic environmental agents. Obstetrics and gynecology. Oct 2013;122(4):931-935.

20.       Recognition and Management of Pesticide Poisonings. U.S. EPA.

21.       Toxic Environmental Agents. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists.

22.       Clinical Practice: Resources. UCSF Program on Reproductive Health and the Environment.

23.       Sathyanarayana S, Focareta J, Dailey T, Buchanan S. Environmental exposures: how to counsel preconception and prenatal patients in the clinical setting. American journal of obstetrics and gynecology. Dec 2012;207(6):463-470.

24.       Pediatric Environmental Health Specialty Units. The Association of Occupational and Environmental Clinics.

25.       Reproductive and Developmental Hazard Management Guidance. American College of Occupational and Environmental Medicine.



Bill said ..

Dr. Runkle is incorrect to suggest that organophosphates (OPs) have been largely replaced by cypermethrin. In fact, the latest data from EPA (2007) shows that chlorpyrifos (the number one OP) is the most heavily used insecticide in agriculture. See Scientists who focus more on residential use of pesticides are often not aware of this, since chlorpyrifos has been prohibited for home/school uses since 2000/2001. However, most kids are exposed to it anyway thanks to residues on food, and drift episodes, which are frequent with OPs. OP exposure has been linked to increased rates of ADHD and other adverse health effects.

July 14, 2014

Comments closed.