Skip to Navigation
Skip to Content

Support PSR!

Make a difference in the challenge to confront global warming and prevent nuclear war and the development and use of nuclear weapons.

Donate Now »

Take Action

Guided by the values and expertise of medicine and public health, Physicians for Social Responsibility works to protect humanity from the gravest threats to health and survival. Right now, you can make a difference by registering your comments on the EPA's new Clean Power rule to limit carbon from existing coal-burning power plants. Just click the button to get started.

Capitol Hill Briefing on the Risks of Nuclear Reactors

May 21, 2010

Dr. Mark Cooper, senior fellow for economic analysis at the Vermont Law School, presented his research on the high and rising cost of building nuclear reactors. He found that cost estimates by reactor venders and utilities in the 1970s and 1980s were extremely low compared to actual reactor construction costs, and that the same pattern of cost underestimation is happening again now. Dr. Cooper compared the cost of low-carbon electricity technologies, concluding that all will benefit from putting a price on carbon, but nuclear will still be too expensive. In his research, he found that there are a dozen cheaper technologies that will meet energy needs and protect electricity ratepayers.  Furthermore, commitment to large nuclear reactors makes it unlikely that a utility will focus on efficiency and renewable energy measures. Dr. Cooper is the author of a comprehensive study on the cost of new reactors in the US, The Economics of Nuclear Reactors: Renaissance or Relapse?.

Peter Bradford, former Commissioner of the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, discussed the fact that loan guarantees do not reduce the financial risk of new reactors; they just shift the risk to taxpayers.  Every $10 billion in loan guarantees represents an exposure of about $100 for every U.S. family. He also talked about the backlash by electricity consumers in states like Florida to increased rates to pay for new reactors. Mr. Bradford also discussed the historical cases in which proposed new reactors led utilities to under-invest in or even reject other cheaper options. He called the provisions that shortcut reactor licensing in the Kerry-Lieberman climate bill “particularly shameful,” especially given consequences of the financial crisis, coal mine accident and Gulf oil spill of weakening safety regulations.

Dr. Alexander Glaser, assistant professor at Princeton University, spoke about the proliferation risks of nuclear power, concluding that “the world is not now safe for a rapid and global expansion of nuclear power.”  He provided two recommendations for what need to be done in the next 10 years to make nuclear power safer: (1) refrain from reprocessing of spent fuel, because it creates weapons-useable material; and (2) build a new framework for the nuclear fuel cycle that includes multilateral enrichment facilities. Dr. Glaser is co-author with Robert Socolow of Balancing Risks: Nuclear Energy & Climate Change in the Fall 2009 issue of Daedalus.


Share on Facebook
Share on MySpace
Share on Twitter
A short URL will be added to the end of your Tweet.

Share on LinkedIn


  • Video: Nuclear Health Risks

    PSR President Dr. Bob Gould talks about the risks to public health and the global environment posed by nuclear weapons and energy. Read more »

  • Annual Report 2012

    PSR is pleased to present its 2012 Annual Report to our members and other stakeholders. Read more »

  • Fukushima Disaster: Impacts & Continuing Threats

    More than two years since the nuclear disaster began at the Fukushima Daiichi reactors, its impact is massive and widespread. It will be decades before the full scope of the impacts of this ongoing disaster is fully understood but significant health, economic, environmental and social consequences are already evident and quantifiable. Read more »

In the Spotlight

  • July 17, 2014
    Our Best Opportunity to Cut Climate Change
    We need you to take action now! Tell the EPA that its proposed rule to cut carbon pollution from power plants Is vitally important and on the right track – but can be strengthened.