- HOME
- About
- Support PSR
- Environment & Health
- Nuclear Weapons
- Safe Energy
- Resources
- Press Room
- Chapters
Make a difference in the challenge to confront global warming and prevent nuclear war and the development and use of nuclear weapons.
Tell President Obama to abolish the Nuclear Loan Guarantee Program.
PSR testified recently before the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) on the health risks associated with coal ash, at the first of seven EPA hearings on disposal of this dangerous coal combustion waste product.
Barbara Gottlieb, deputy director of environment and health, and Alan Lockwood, MD FAAN, a member of the PSR board, outlined the dangers to health from toxicants that leach, leak and spill from coal ash disposal sites around the country.
Coal ash contains arsenic, lead, mercury, cadmium, chromium, selenium and other deadly toxic metals that can cause cancer and neurological harm in humans and can kill and cause deformities in wildlife, especially fish and other water-dwelling species.
Toxicants have escaped from coal ash storage sites across the nation and contaminated above-ground and underground waterways and, in some cases, drinking-water wells, in over 100 documented instances.
As Dr. Lockwood noted about arsenic, the most common coal ash toxicant, “Arsenic is a known carcinogen that causes cancers of the skin, lung, and urinary bladder. …Exposure to arsenic also increases the risk of developing Type II Diabetes Mellitus, a largely preventable, devastating, and expensive disease.”
PSR calls for federal regulation
The EPA has put forth two options for coal ash disposal, only one of which would require mandatory federal regulation. PSR has strongly endorsed that option, known as “Subtitle C,” as the only alternative currently on the table that would adequately protect human health.
Coal ash is currently regulated by the states, and their laws are frequently too weak to prevent unsafe dumping practices such as storing coal ash in gravel pits and quarries, unlined landfills, abandoned mines, and in enormous “ponds.” When a coal ash pond in Tennessee burst in December 2008, it inundated a river valley with a billion gallons of toxic sludge.
In the hearing, Gottlieb voiced PSR’s call for:
PSR urges all of its members to contact the EPA voicing their support for strong, federally enforceable safeguards that guarantee coal ash will not pollute our drinking water, rivers, streams, wildlife and communities. The EPA is now accepting comments via email. Consult PSR’s fact sheets on what coal ash is and why it is dangerous, health impacts of six of the worst toxicants in coal ash, and how to submit comments to the EPA.
In response to widespread expressions of concern over coal ash, the EPA also scheduled public hearings in Denver, Dallas, Charlotte, NC, Chicago, Pittsburgh and Louisville. More information on those hearings, which will take place during September, is provided by the EPA. PSR members in or near those cities are urged to sign up to testify in person at their local hearing.
PSR will release on Sept. 8 a detailed report on coal ash’s impacts on health. Check back with our website then.
Public comments may be submitted to the EPA via email until Nov. 19.
Thank President Obama for his courageous and health-protecting decision not to permit construction of the Keystone XL pipeline.
The Safe Chemicals Act of 2011 would require the chemical industry to ensure chemicals are safe before they go on the market. Ask your Senator to support health-protective chemicals policy by making a call today.
The Spanish-language version of the PSR report, "Hazardous Chemicals In Health Care," written with the American Nurses Association and Health Care Without Harm (HCWH), details the first investigation of environmental chemicals found in the bodies of health care professionals. Read more »
Read PSR’s October, 2009, report: "Hazardous Chemicals In Health Care." Of 20 health care professionals tested for the presence of industrial chemicals in their bodies, all 20 had at least 24 individual chemicals present, many of which are associated with chronic illness and physical disorders. Read more »
Happy holidays from the Environmental Health Policy Institute! This holiday season we highlight some of our favorite tools and resources for health professionals and others concerned about the health effects of industrial chemicals. Read more »