Skip to Navigation
Skip to Content
Share this page

Support PSR!

Your membership supports PSR's work to reduce global warming, eliminate toxics in our environment and abolish nuclear weapons. YOU make our work possible. Thank you.

Donate Now »

Heat Advisory: Protecting Health on a Warming Planet
by Dr. Alan Lockwood

Drawing on peer-reviewed scientific and medical research, Dr. Lockwood meticulously details the symptoms of climate change and their medical side effects.

On sale now! Enter code M17ENV25 at checkout for 25% discount.

PSR Signals Intention to Sue U.S. EPA for Release of Coal Ash Rule

January 18, 2012

PSR, acting with environmental organizations, filed a Notice of Intent to sue the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) to require the Agency to release rules for safe disposal of coal ash, the toxic waste left when electrical utilities burn coal.

The Notice of Intent, filed January 18, calls on the EPA to complete a “timely review” of its pending coal ash regulations, as required by law under the  Resource Conservation and Recovery Act.  The letter also asks EPA to review the outdated test it uses to determine the toxicity of coal ash constituents.

PSR spokesperson Maureen McCue, MD, PhD, president of the PSR Iowa chapter, told reporters that, a year and a half after she testified at an EPA coal ash hearing in 2010, “Nothing has happened since then except that these toxins continue to mount.  Our water and health continue to be threatened by the ongoing accumulation of these toxic materials.”

Because burning concentrates coal’s impurities, coal ash is heavily laden with some of the most dangerous toxic metals in the world, including arsenic, mercury, lead, chromium, cadmium and selenium.  These and other toxicants in coal ash are or can be carcinogenic and can damage the lungs, heart, peripheral nervous system, brain, intestines, liver and kidneys.

PSR has been and continues to be active on coal ash, filing written comments with the EPA, testifying at hearings, educating legislators, and producing resources including Coal Ash:  The Toxic Threat to Our Health and Environment (pdf). 

 “Regrettably, it has become necessary to challenge EPA for its failure to release coal ash safeguards in timely fashion,” stated Barbara Gottlieb, director of PSR’s Environment and Health program.  “EPA’s inaction places hundreds of communities at great risk.”

With coal-burning utilities producing 140 million tons of coal ash every year, the ash constitutes an enormous waste stream.   It is typically disposed in “ponds,” sometimes the size of small lakes, which frequently are unlined and may be held back by earthen walls.  Breaks in these walls, accidental spills, and leaching of toxic elements has led to widespread contamination of groundwater and surface water. 

In December 2008, the collapse of the coal ash impoundment at the Tennessee Valley Authority’s Kingston Fossil Plant, which flooded 300 acres of a riverfront community with 1 billion gallons of toxic sludge.  This disaster destroyed the local community, resulted in a multi-year cleanup estimated to cost more than $1.2 billion, and caused the permanent displacement of dozens of families.

In late October 2011, another significant spill occurred in Oak Creek, Wisconsin, where an unregulated coal ash disposal site collapsed into Lake Michigan, inundating the lake and shoreline with 25,000 tons of coal ash. Regulations addressing coal ash disposal might have prevented such disasters and would certainly help to prevent future ones, the NOI notes.

The EPA has 60 days to reach an agreement with PSR and the other potential plaintiffs, which include Earthjustice, Environmental Integrity Project, Sierra Club, and local environmental groups from affected communities across the country.  If no out-of-court agreement is reached, the issue will move to litigation.

Action Alerts

More action alertsĀ»


More »


  • Webinar: Health Risks of Nuclear Power

    As PSR chapters promote the transition to clean renewable energy, some are finding that nuclear power is being proposed as renewable. This webinar explores exactly why nuclear is not clean, not safe and not renewable. Read more »

  • Fracking Compendium 5 Water Excerpt

    Given the timely and important consideration of the issue by state officials in Florida, Physicians for Social Responsibility, along with Concerned Health Professionals of New York, has released excerpts from the upcoming Fifth Edition of the Compendium of Scientific, Medical, and Media Findings Demonstrating Risks and Harms of Fracking. Released in Miami in advance of the full report, this new document contains an up-to-date analysis and compilation of the science on water contamination risks from drilling, fracking, and associated activities. Read more »

  • Natural Gas: Not a healthy or climate-protective solution for the Clean Power Plan

    Building natural gas plants to replace coal-fired power is not a solution to the climate crisis; it merely replaces one fossil fuel with another. Read more »

In the Spotlight

  • April 28, 2018
    2018 Greenfield Peace Writing Scholarship Awards Ceremony
    Join Oregon PSR to celebrate the high school student winners of this year's scholarship. Featuring keynote speaker Marshallese anti-nuclear and climate activist and poet Kathy Jetnil-Kijiner. April 28 at 6 pm in Portland, Oregon.