Make a difference in the challenge to confront global warming and prevent nuclear war and the development and use of nuclear weapons.
Please voice your support for a strong, health-protective rule by submitting your comment to the EPA today.
Bush Proposal Too Little, Too Late
Administration continues to show little understanding of climate science
April 16, 2008
(Washington, DC) Physicians for Social Responsibility (PSR) expressed disappointment in the president’s approach to control global warming, presented today in a speech at the White House. The administration would reduce emissions, primarily carbon dioxide from electric generating plants across the country after 2025, ignoring the well established goal of a reducing all domestic greenhouse gas emissions by more than 20 percent by that time.
“PSR doctors and public health professionals are scientists and take seriously the short term and long term reduction goals necessary to prevent the catastrophic consequences of climate change. We know that the U.S. must begin reducing total greenhouse gas emissions immediately and show a steady decline for the next four decades, ultimately reaching at least an 80 percent reduction in U.S. emissions. The president’s plan is not even a good starting point,” stated Dr. Michael McCally, executive director for PSR.
As global warming accelerates the public health will suffer from more severe heat waves, more intense storms, worse flooding, increased allergens and the spread of water and vector borne diseases. An immediate effort by the U.S. to reduce its own emissions and lead the world in global reductions will help to reduce the seriousness of these dangerous impacts.
Based on projections by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, global emissions need to be reduced by some 85 percent by 2050. As a major contributor of greenhouse gas emissions, the U.S. must take the lead. Yet, the White House recommendations would not begin significant reductions for almost two decades. “It has taken this administration seven years to come up with an ineffective plan. The president’s lack of leadership and weak proposal put the health of the American people and the world at risk,” added McCally.
PSR, founded in 1961 and awarded the Nobel Peace Prize in 1985, is guided by the values and expertise of medicine and public health and works to protect human life from the gravest threats to health and survival.
Annual Report 2012
PSR is pleased to present its 2012 Annual Report to our members and other stakeholders. Read more »
Toxic Chemicals in Our Food System
What chemicals are in the food we eat? Chemicals are used in every step of the process that puts food on our table: production, harvesting, processing, packing, transport, marketing and consumption and can be dangerous to our health. Read more »
Fracking: Harm on the Farm
Chemical exposures that harm farm animals and wild animals raise concern about health risks for people living near fracking sites, as the animals use the same water and breathe the same air as humans. Another, indirect concern for human health also exists: in multiple known cases of chemical exposure, cows continued to produce dairy and meat for human consumption, although it remained untested for chemical contaminants. Read more »
In the Spotlight
July 17, 2014
Our Best Opportunity to Cut Climate Change
We need you to take action now! Tell the EPA that its proposed rule to cut carbon pollution from power plants Is vitally important and on the right track – but can be strengthened.