- HOME
- About
- Support PSR
- Environment & Health
- Nuclear Weapons
- Nuclear Power
- Resources
- News & Events
- Chapters
Your membership supports PSR's work to reduce global warming, eliminate toxics in our environment and abolish nuclear weapons. YOU make our work possible. Thank you.
Drawing on peer-reviewed scientific and medical research, Dr. Lockwood meticulously details the symptoms of climate change and their medical side effects.
On sale now! Enter code M17ENV25 at checkout for 25% discount.
EPA's New Particulate Matter Standards
Fail To Protect Public Health
September 22, 2006
Ignoring the recommendations of its own expert science advisors, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) announced on September 21st a final decision on new national air quality standards for particulate matter that will fail to protect public health. The EPA’s Clean Air Scientific Advisory Committee, its Children’s Health Protection Advisory Committee, and an unprecedented number of national medical and public health organizations all called upon the EPA to set much tougher standards. Instead, EPA chose to adopt standards which scientific studies have shown are not adequately sufficient to protect the health of Americans from particle pollution.
Fine particulate matter microscopic particles formed primarily from automobile and power plant emissions is a highly dangerous form of air pollution linked to a range of adverse health effects. Each year, tens of thousands of Americans die prematurely from breathing particle pollution, while thousands more suffer from heart attacks, strokes, asthma attacks and lung cancer.
In its finalized rule, EPA chose to retain the current annual fine particle standard at 15 micrograms per cubic meter and lower the daily standard to 35 micrograms per cubic meter. While EPA officials say these standards reflect the best available science on the health effects of particulate matter, more than 2,000 peer-reviewed scientific studies published since the EPA last updated the standards in 1997 provide overwhelming evidence that particle pollution poses serious health risks at levels well below those announced by EPA on Thursday. PSR, along with a number of other national public health organizations, advocated for lowering the annual standard to 12 microgram per cubic meter and tightening the daily standard to 25 micrograms per cubic meter. Had EPA adopted such standards, it is estimated that particle pollution-related deaths would be reduced by as much as 86 percent.
The Clean Air Act requires EPA to set ambient air quality standards that are stringent enough to protect healthy individuals and the most vulnerable populations - including children, the elderly, and people suffering from lung and cardiovascular diseases. By putting politics before science in finalizing these particulate matter standards, EPA has failed in its duty to protect the health of the American public.
Click here to read comments submitted to EPA
by PSR and other health organizations in April
Tell the Trump Administration: Protect us from methane and toxic gas leaks from fracked-gas wells on federal lands!
Rolling Stone magazine calls the PSR and Concerned Health Professionals of NY report on fracking's effects "the most authoritative study of its kind." Help us amplify it!
As PSR chapters promote the transition to clean renewable energy, some are finding that nuclear power is being proposed as renewable. This webinar explores exactly why nuclear is not clean, not safe and not renewable. Read more »
Given the timely and important consideration of the issue by state officials in Florida, Physicians for Social Responsibility, along with Concerned Health Professionals of New York, has released excerpts from the upcoming Fifth Edition of the Compendium of Scientific, Medical, and Media Findings Demonstrating Risks and Harms of Fracking. Released in Miami in advance of the full report, this new document contains an up-to-date analysis and compilation of the science on water contamination risks from drilling, fracking, and associated activities. Read more »
Building natural gas plants to replace coal-fired power is not a solution to the climate crisis; it merely replaces one fossil fuel with another. Read more »