Skip to Navigation
Skip to Content

Support PSR!

Make a difference in the challenge to confront global warming and prevent nuclear war and the development and use of nuclear weapons.

Donate Now »

Take Action

Guided by the values and expertise of medicine and public health, Physicians for Social Responsibility works to protect humanity from the gravest threats to health and survival. Right now, you can make a difference by registering your comments on the EPA's new Clean Power rule to limit carbon from existing coal-burning power plants. Just click the button to get started.

PSR Statement on the Nuclear Regulatory Near-Term Task Force Review of Fukushima Dai-ichi Disaster

July 13, 2011

PSR supports many of the recommendations raised by the NRC’s Near-Term Task Force Review,[1] but the report fails to recommend moving spent fuel from packed spent fuel pools to hardened on-site storage..  These recommendations should be implemented as quickly as possible – before the NRC issues any more new licenses, license renewals or design certifications – and not allowed to languish, as has happened with fire-protection rules (recently waived by the NRC Commission until 2016).

An important and integral recommendation is missing from the Near-Term Task Force Review: moving spent fuel from packed spent fuel pools to hardened on-site storage. PSR supports the Principles for Safeguarding Nuclear Waste at Reactor Sites, which call for hardening spent fuel onsite and physically protecting spent fuel pools. Over 170 national and local organizations from all 50 states have signed onto the Principles,[2] yet the NRC continues to ignore this obvious measure to ensure public safety.  PSR urges the NRC’s longer term task force to incorporate this proposal.

Although not within the scope of the review, the Near-Term Task Force has offhandedly – and prematurely – concluded that there is an “expectation of no significant radiological health effects” from the Fukushima Dai-ichi disaster.  The fact is that the effects of long-term exposure on large populations are unknown and it will be many years before the incidents of cancer and other health effects emerge.  Rigorous epidemiological studies of workers at the site and populations both in Fukushima and throughout Japan must be started now and continued for decades.  

The amount of radiation that has been released from Fukushima – recently doubled from the original estimates – and the amount that will continue to be released is largely unknown. It is the consensus of the medical and scientific community, summarized in the US National Academies’ National Research Council report Biological Effects of Ionizing Radiation VII (BEIR VII report),[3] that there is no “safe” level of radiation.  Any exposure, including exposure to naturally occurring background radiation, creates an increased risk of cancer. Moreover, children are much more vulnerable than adults to the effects of radiation, and fetuses are even more vulnerable. 

Clearly, there is a lot that must be done quickly to improve the safety of operating reactors, but the NRC’s Near-Term Task Force recommendations are only stop-gap measures.  The only way to ensure public safety is to phase-out nuclear power and to implement policies to build up sustainable, safe renewable energy and efficiency.  


Share

EmailFacebookTwitter
Share on Facebook
Cancel
Share on MySpace
Cancel
Share on Twitter
A short URL will be added to the end of your Tweet.

Cancel
Share on LinkedIn
Cancel

Related Contact

Resources

  • Video: Nuclear Health Risks

    PSR President Dr. Bob Gould talks about the risks to public health and the global environment posed by nuclear weapons and energy. Read more »

  • Annual Report 2012

    PSR is pleased to present its 2012 Annual Report to our members and other stakeholders. Read more »

  • Fukushima Disaster: Impacts & Continuing Threats

    More than two years since the nuclear disaster began at the Fukushima Daiichi reactors, its impact is massive and widespread. It will be decades before the full scope of the impacts of this ongoing disaster is fully understood but significant health, economic, environmental and social consequences are already evident and quantifiable. Read more »

In the Spotlight

  • July 17, 2014
    Our Best Opportunity to Cut Climate Change
    We need you to take action now! Tell the EPA that its proposed rule to cut carbon pollution from power plants Is vitally important and on the right track – but can be strengthened.