Skip to Navigation
Skip to Content

Support PSR!

Make a difference in the challenge to confront global warming and prevent nuclear war and the development and use of nuclear weapons.

Donate Now »

Take Action

Please voice your support for a strong, health-protective rule by submitting your comment to the EPA today.

Top 5 Worst Actions of the Bush Administration

October 20, 2008

The Top 5 Worst Actions of the Bush Administration Regarding
Chemical Exposure, Scientific Integrity
and Our Public Health

The deregulation of the chemical industry and weakening of U.S. government regulatory process for chemicals has led to an alarmingly high rate of contamination in the environment and the bodies of those exposed to a variety of chemicals.

Bisphenol A in baby and water bottles, PBDE's from flame retardants, phthalates in toys, and perchlorate from jet fuel are just a few of more than 60,000 chemicals that have gone virtually unregulated for their hazards to human health.  More and more scientific studies demonstrate the links between chemicals and the rise in rates of illness today: obesity, thyroid disease, diabetes, breast cancer, prostate cancer, childhood cancers, reproductive and developmental problems and other health effects are seen as the results.  Yet, industry has attacked the science and the scientists even in the government who are trying to protect our public health.

Physicians for Social Responsibility and other health advocates surveyed more than 100 thought leaders working on these issues and identified the Top 5 worst actions of the current administration that have led to widespread contamination from chemicals.  We recently presented these findings to presidential candidates John McCain and Barack Obama, requesting that chemical exposure concerns be a top priority for the next President of the United States.

The Top 5 Worst Actions committed by the George W. Bush administration: 

1. Administration "Gag Rule" on its own EPA scientists and staff,  preventing them from speaking publicly

2. Approval of a human testing rule to intentionally dose human beings, especially children, with industrial chemicals and pesticides

3. Allowance of corporations to keep secret their activities with toxic biological, chemical or radiological materials (Patriot Act II. SECTION 202)

4. Elimination of protections for workers from toxic chemicals in the workplace

5. EPA refusal to allow California and other states to set their own regulations to mitigate climate change

Runners up:

  • Refusal of U.S. to support the intent of international treaties on chemicals: for example the Stockholm Convention, obstructing efforts to ban lindane (linked to brain tumors), endosulfan (linked to autism) and other Persistent Organic Pollutants and ozone depleting methyl bromide
  • U.S. impeding Global Warming talks
  • EPA neglect of contaminated communities in Brunswick, GA,  Mossville, LA, Dixon, TN; dioxin contaminated communities in Michigan and Texas; and indigenous communities in Alaska 

Links:

Letter to Presidential Candidates

Top 5 Worst Actions of Current Administration Regarding Chemical Exposure, Scientific Integrity and Our Public Health: Summary Report

Contact: Will Callaway, Communications Director, Physicians for Social Responsibility
202-667-4260 x224 wcallaway@psr.org 

Share

EmailFacebookTwitter
Share on Facebook
Cancel
Share on MySpace
Cancel
Share on Twitter
A short URL will be added to the end of your Tweet.

Cancel
Share on LinkedIn
Cancel

Action Alerts

More action alerts»

Resources

  • Annual Report 2012

    PSR is pleased to present its 2012 Annual Report to our members and other stakeholders. Read more »

  • Toxic Chemicals in Our Food System

    What chemicals are in the food we eat? Chemicals are used in every step of the process that puts food on our table: production, harvesting, processing, packing, transport, marketing and consumption and can be dangerous to our health. Read more »

  • Fracking: Harm on the Farm

    Chemical exposures that harm farm animals and wild animals raise concern about health risks for people living near fracking sites, as the animals use the same water and breathe the same air as humans. Another, indirect concern for human health also exists: in multiple known cases of chemical exposure, cows continued to produce dairy and meat for human consumption, although it remained untested for chemical contaminants. Read more »

In the Spotlight

  • July 17, 2014
    Our Best Opportunity to Cut Climate Change
    We need you to take action now! Tell the EPA that its proposed rule to cut carbon pollution from power plants Is vitally important and on the right track – but can be strengthened.