Make a difference in the challenge to confront global warming and prevent nuclear war and the development and use of nuclear weapons.
Tell President Obama that the United States should join the international movement to ban nuclear weapons worldwide.
Back from the Brink?
May 23, 2012
In the past few days, we have seen promising signs that the P5 + 1 and Iran are close to an agreement on Iran’s dual-use nuclear program. While an agreement would be the first of many confidence-building measures, this achievement is an indication that international diplomatic and financial pressure may have worked to bring Iran back to the negotiating table. If Iran shows its willingness to operate under International Atomic Energy Agency safeguards, the international community must ease economic sanctions and begin a process of normalizing relations with the country.
While these reports are a promising development, Iran has historically shown a willingness to walk back progress made on the negotiating table over their nuclear program. As we move forward, our imperative must be to provide Iran a reason to overcome their justified mistrust of the international community.
The recent debate over the National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) is an example of the type of counter-productive debate and action that we must avoid. Rep. Conaway (R-TX) successfully added an amendment to the NDAA that will:
- Add munitions and weapons to the forward-deployed U.S. stockpile in Israel
- Expand joint Israeli / U.S. joint military exercises and an expanded Israeli role in NATO
- Enhance the military capabilities of Persian Gulf allies to bolster the posture of such allies in relation to Iran.
If ratified, the NDAA could start an arms race in the Middle East. This language must be stripped from the final bill or the Administration should follow through on their threat to veto. Moves from the United States towards an aggressive posture on Iran will empower hardliners in Iran to override any recent progress. The only reasonable course of action is to provide a roadmap for Iran that pairs confidence-building actions with stepped decreases in international economic sanctions.
The larger context of the conflict over Iran’s nuclear program also must become part of the process. After the 2010 Non-Proliferation Treaty Review Conference, state parties agreed to five practical steps to make progress towards implementing the 1995 NPT Review Conference Middle East Resolution. The United States will have to play a key role in bringing Israel to the table and initiate the first steps towards a more stable Middle East.
In addition, the United States and Russia must take meaningful steps towards substantial bilateral reductions in their strategic and tactical nuclear arsenals. The continued possession of nuclear weapons is the strongest guarantee of proliferation and both countries' arsenals are far beyond even the levels needed for a minimum level of deterrence.
PSR Statement on Iran
Comments Leave a Comment
Nuclear Famine: Two Billion People at Risk?
PSR's new, updated report on the global impacts of limited nuclear war on agriculture, food supplies, and human nutrition. Read more »
Climate Change and Conflict
Slides from a webinar presented by PSR Board Member Dr. Cindy Parker on the connection between climate change, resources, and war. Read more »
Zero Is the Only Option
In March 2010, International Physicians for the Prevention of Nuclear War and PSR docs Vic Sidel and Ira Helfand published a major new briefing paper on the global climate and health effects of nuclear war. Zero is the only option was produced for the 2010 Non-Proliferation Treaty Review Conference. Read more »
In the Spotlight
December 3, 2013
Climate Change: Impacts on Public Health
Open to the public, this dinner program highlights the relationship between climate change and health, and provides ideas for mitigation. Featuring keynote speakers Dr. George Luber and Meredith Jagger.