Skip to Navigation
Skip to Content
Share this page

Support PSR!

Your membership supports PSR's work to reduce global warming, eliminate toxics in our environment and abolish nuclear weapons. YOU make our work possible. Thank you.

Donate Now »

Take Action

Join us as we urge the Port of Kalama to study the full climate, health, and safety impacts of this project.

Key Updates from the Nonproliferation Treaty Review Conference at the UN

Posted by Ira Helfand, MD on May 6, 2010

Two issues with special relevance to PSR are emerging here at the NPT review in New York:

Austria, Switzerland, China and the 80 odd nations of the Non Aligned Movement (NAM) have explicitly endorsed a Nuclear Weapons Convention (NWC), and recommended that a call to initiate negotiations for a NWC be included in the final document of the Review Conference.  The call reflects a widely held view among participants that nuclear disarmament is as important as non proliferation and can not be put off indefinitely as it has in the past.

Unfortunately the US and the other nuclear weapons states all appear to be opposing inclusion of a call for a NWC at this time, calling it a distraction from the short term concrete measures that the Review Conference needs to focus on for it to be a success.

What a mistake.  The Obama administration should welcome a strong statement from the Review Conference calling on the nuclear weapons states to begin to negotiate a NWC.  It is fully consistent with the President's call for a world free of nuclear weapons and there is no reason why negotiations on such a treaty can not proceed along with negotiations for some of the interim measures that are, in fact, steps towards the complete elimination of nuclear weapons that a treaty will require.

The other issue that is quite striking from a PSR perspective is the widespread commitment to nuclear power expressed here.  Access to "peaceful" nuclear technology has been cited repeatedly as a key requirement for states in the global South to realize sustainable development.  This widespread, misplaced faith in nuclear power as the solution to our energy needs suggests that PSR needs to be even more energetic in our opposition to nuclear power, and we need to figure out ways to work with our sister organizations around the world to help people in the developing world understand that nuclear power is not answer.


Christopher Rohan said ..

Thanks Ira. Seems like a no brainer to include NWC for disarmament along with nonproliferation. Not sure I even see a distinction, although there must be something I am missing. The call for nuclear power as clean is hard to combat for whatever reason. The only folks who don't see sense in it are like Sally Williams who lives near the waste. The big question , what to do with the waste, also cost of decomissioning. Consider this oil spill and compare it to a nuclear spill. Nuclear would be 1000x worse and would not clean up , ever....

May 19, 2010
Sally Laidlaw Williams said ..

I completely concur with getting rid of ALL nuclear weapons, and that there's no such thing as "clean" or "green" nuclear power; the cancer rate near every nuclear facility is higher than normal. In my home state of Idaho the waste from the Idaho site has now reached the Snake River aquifer, which waters many of the crops in souther Idaho. Nuclear equates with death.

May 6, 2010

Comments closed.