Make a difference in the challenge to confront global warming and prevent nuclear war and the development and use of nuclear weapons.
Make a phone call today to stop $10 billion in dangerous spending.
What is the true ultimate nightmare ?
Thomas B. Newman, MD, MPH
December 7, 2010
PSR Board Member Thomas B. Newman responds to an Op Ed by Washington Post columnist Charles Krauthammer, "The Irrelevance of New Start"
According to Charles Krauthammer, (Washington Post, 11/25/10) "A world without nukes would be the ultimate nightmare." Didn't he feel ridiculous writing this? Hello! A nuclear war would be the ultimate nightmare.
First, a world without nuclear weapons would be just that, not a world in which nuclear weapons still exist. Unlike other types of weapons, international control of nuclear weapons is feasible because of the difficulty creating fissile material. This is why we need a Fissile Material Cutoff Treaty.
Second, Krauthammer seems naïvely to believe that our nuclear weapons will deter rogues, radicals and psychopaths. Wouldn't it be better to keep nuclear weapons out of their hands in the first place? The only way this can happen is by delegitimizing these hideous weapons and strengthening international treaties such as the Nuclear Nonproliferation Treaty.
Krauthammer argues against arms control treaties because, "the problem is never the weapon, it is the regime controlling the weapon." To him, a nuclear exchange between the US and Russia is "inconceivable." This ignores the vast literature on the risk of accidental nuclear war -- see e.g. an article in the New England Journal of Medicine: Accidental Nuclear War — A Post–Cold War Assessment.
He writes, "…that's why no one worries about British nukes and everyone worries about Iranian nukes." Perhaps no one in the US worries about British nukes. But perhaps people in Iran do worry about them, or about US and Israeli nukes and conventional weapons.
Rather than trying to perpetuate an unsustainable world of nuclear haves and have-nots, thoughtful strategists from both parties and the vast majority of the world's population believe we would be safer in a world free of nuclear weapons. The New Start treaty is a small step in the right direction.
Thomas B. Newman, MD, MPH
Board Member, Physicians for Social Responsibility
Comments Leave a Comment
Nuclear Famine: A Billion People at Risk
The newly generated data on the decline in agricultural production that would follow a limited, regional nuclear war in South Asia support the concern that more than one billion people would be in danger of starvation. Epidemic disease and further conflict spawned by such a famine would put additional hundreds of millions at risk. Read more »
Shock and Awe Hits Home
The military operational costs of the war in Iraq, now greater than $500 billion, have surpassed those for the entire Vietnam conflict. These escalating operational costs are alarming, yet the long-term public health costs will be much greater. Read more »
Video: Nukes, Militarism and Public Health
Interview with PSR board member Dr. Andy Kanter. Read more »