Skip to Navigation
Skip to Content

Support PSR!

Make a difference in the challenge to confront global warming and prevent nuclear war and the development and use of nuclear weapons.

Donate Now »

Take Action

Let your voice be heard! Send a letter to the editor of your local newspaper supporting the Pope’s call for protecting the planet from climate change.

Sanctions and Iran

Posted by Jill Marie Parillo on April 19, 2009

A Congressional testimony, called "Changing Iran's behavior" by Dr. Trita Parsi, is one of the most concise and comprehensive explanations of why more sanctions (in the form of divestment) will not provoke positive change in Iran's government. Key points:

  • Sanctions have hurt the Iranian economy, but have failed to change the government's behavior.
  • The government can use oil revenues as a cushion to offset the effects of sanctions.
  • The people of Iran are directing their anger over economic distress towards the United States not their government.
  • Absent competition from international companies and the demands for transparency and efficiency, sanctions strengthen the hard-line elements' hold and control over the economy.
  • Entities connected to the government, such as the Iranian Revolutionary Guard Corps, profit from their involvement in the smuggling trade.
  • The Iranian government's success in circumventing sanctions makes Iran less sensitive to new sanctions. There is a diminishing return on additional sanctions.
  • Economic sanctions weaken the emerging middle class, whose income is dependent on the advancement of the non-state economy. As long as the lion's share of the economy is controlled by the state, room for pushing for political liberalization will be severely limited.
  • What has been lacking, is confidence in Tehran that a change in behavior would lead to the lifting of sanctions.
  • Reality is that Washington has significant leverage over Tehran if willingness exists to trade away existing sanctions for extensive changes in Iranian policies.
  • It is not the threat or imposition of new sanctions that is likely to achieve the desired changes in Iranian behavior, but the promise of lifting existing ones.
  • Neither threats nor promises are likely to succeed if they are made from a distance.
  • In this atmosphere of mistrust, neither side has much room for error... Congress passing additional sanctions before diplomacy has begun...would only reduce the prospects for diplomacy by poisoning the atmosphere and further increasing mistrust.
  • After a decade-and-a-half of failed sanctions and economic pressure, and three decades of hostility, it is not sanctions or divestment that deserves another chance. It is diplomacy and the opportunity to use the leverage that sanctions provide in the context of a negotiation that should be given the space and time to succeed.

See the full text here.


Leave your comment

Enter this word: Change

Action Alerts

More action alerts»


  • Video: We Have an Iran Deal! Now What?

    Watch PSR Security Program's latest webinar to understand the details of the Iran Deal and what you can do to keep the deal safe from Congress. Featuring speaker Kelsey Davenport, Arms Control Association. Read more »

  • Video: Paths to Disarmament: The NPT and the Humanitarian Initiative

    In this webinar, John Loretz of PSR's international affiliate, International Physicians for the Prevention of Nuclear War, discusses the Non-Proliferation Treaty and the effort to rid the world of nuclear weapons on humanitarian grounds. Read more »

  • Body Count

    Authored by IPPNW-Germany, the report is a comprehensive account of the vast human toll of the "Wars on Terror" conducted in the name of the American people since September 11, 2001. Read more »

In the Spotlight

  • September 19, 2015
    Nukebusters Short Film Awards
    The votes are in! Five hundred people and three celebrity judges chose the best films on nuclear weapons.