Make a difference in the challenge to confront global warming and prevent nuclear war and the development and use of nuclear weapons.
Climate change’s threats to human health and life are growing. Will you join our latest effort to roll back climate change?
State of the Union Response - Please Comment
January 26, 2011
PSR was pleased to hear the President of the United States celebrate the ratification of the New Strategic Arms Reduction Treaty (START) in his State of the Union address. He said, "Because Republicans and Democrats approved the New START Treaty, far fewer nuclear weapons and launchers will be deployed. Because we rallied the world, nuclear materials are being locked down on every continent."
PSR believes that a stronger commitment to next steps is essential to reduce nuclear dangers. We hoped to hear him clearly state in this public forum his ongoing determination to pursue the swift ratification of the Comprehensive Test Ban Treaty (CTBT) and further cuts in our bloated nuclear arsenals, with a renewed focus on tactical nuclear weapons and non-deployed weapons.
Now is not the time for timid steps. The urgency of the threats facing us require that we act in new bold ways to secure our health and safety. If fully understood, the reality of these horrific weapons compels us to take urgent action to reduce the danger. PSR knows that the only way these weapons will not eventually be used is if they are abolished completely worldwide.
I'm 1 More 4 Zero. Are you? Check out our new campaign at 1more4zero.org.
We also note with concern the President's proposal to freeze all non-military discretionary spending for 5 years. This prejudices the bloated military budget above all else. At this critical juncture, we need to listen to the many voices calling for significant cuts in military spending. Just this week, General Colin Powell said the, "defense budget can't be sacrosanct' if Congress is serious about fixing budgetary woes."
As always, PSR seeks to prevent what we cannot cure. In this context, it is vital that we remind all our leaders that significant investment in a real clean energy future is essential to our health and our planet's survival. We should not allow dirty coal and dangerous and expensive nuclear power to be falsely included as part of a clean energy standard. Instead, we should reduce military spending and invest in green jobs as a means of growing our economy, increasing national security, and securing a safe and healthy future.
We want to know what you think. Please use the comment section of this blog to start a conversation with your PSR colleagues.
Comments Leave a Comment
Nuclear Famine: A Billion People at Risk
The newly generated data on the decline in agricultural production that would follow a limited, regional nuclear war in South Asia support the concern that more than one billion people would be in danger of starvation. Epidemic disease and further conflict spawned by such a famine would put additional hundreds of millions at risk. Read more »
Shock and Awe Hits Home
The military operational costs of the war in Iraq, now greater than $500 billion, have surpassed those for the entire Vietnam conflict. These escalating operational costs are alarming, yet the long-term public health costs will be much greater. Read more »
Video: Nukes, Militarism and Public Health
Interview with PSR board member Dr. Andy Kanter. Read more »