Make a difference in the challenge to confront global warming and prevent nuclear war and the development and use of nuclear weapons.
Call on Congress to give the same tax benefits to clean, healthy, renewable wind energy that they do to dirty fossil and nuclear fuels.
The oil spill reminds us that "Fail-safe systems" do, in fact, fail with horrific consequences
Ira Helfand, MD
May 5, 2010
The Non Proliferation Treaty review conference begins this week in New York against the back drop of one of the worst environmental disasters in decades, and the ongoing oil leak in the Gulf should give the nuclear negotiators at the UN much to think about.
During an interview on NPR this week, the CEO of BP kept referring to the “Fail-safe” system that they had built to guarantee that there would never be a catastrophic leak. Finally the NPR host interrupted him, “‘Fail-safe’—isn’t that the system that failed?” Yes, the CEO agreed, but it was an “unprecedented” break down that no one imagined could happen.
The BP leak in the Gulf is not only an ecological disaster which exposes the folly of “Drill, baby, drill!” It also speaks powerfully to the need to eliminate the world’s nuclear arsenals.
The US and Russia continue to maintain thousands of nuclear weapons, more than 2000 of them on high alert status able to be launched in minutes. We are told that this incredible deployment posture is safe and stable. “Fail-safe” systems are in place. It would take an “unprecedented” break down of these systems to allow an accidental or unauthorized launch of these weapons. Exactly.
The Russian and US military have undoubtedly built the best system they possibly could to protect against accidental war. The problem is that human beings, and the technical systems we build, are fallible. The chance of failure may be very low in any one year, but it is not zero.
The cost of the well failure in the Gulf may be in the billions of dollars before this spill is fully contained. The cost of an accidental nuclear war might well be the end of human civilization. It is a price we can not afford.
Comments Leave a Comment
Nuclear Famine: Two Billion People at Risk?
PSR's new, updated report on the global impacts of limited nuclear war on agriculture, food supplies, and human nutrition. Read more »
Zero Is the Only Option
In March 2010, International Physicians for the Prevention of Nuclear War and PSR docs Vic Sidel and Ira Helfand published a major new briefing paper on the global climate and health effects of nuclear war. Zero is the only option was produced for the 2010 Non-Proliferation Treaty Review Conference. Read more »
Steps to Safety (for General Audiences)
PowerPoint presentation on how nuclear weapons put the United States at risk today--and how we can reduce and eventually eliminate the danger posed by the thousands of nuclear weapons still stockpiled in nuclear arsenals, the tons of nuclear bomb making material vulnerable to theft by extremists, and the specter of more nations potentially seeking nuclear weapons. Read more »
In the Spotlight
December 3, 2013
Climate Change: Impacts on Public Health
Open to the public, this dinner program highlights the relationship between climate change and health, and provides ideas for mitigation. Featuring keynote speakers Dr. George Luber and Meredith Jagger.