Make a difference in the challenge to confront global warming and prevent nuclear war and the development and use of nuclear weapons.
Climate change’s threats to human health and life are growing. Will you join our latest effort to roll back climate change?
What does the fiscal cliff vote leave undone?
January 4, 2013
On Tuesday, January 1st, the House of Representatives voted 257 - 167 in favor of the Senate brokered agreement on resolving the fiscal cliff debate for 2 months. The compromise does 2 main things:
1. Provided a compromise on revenue. Tax rates for Americans earning less than $400,000 (individually) or $450,000 (household) remain the same. For Americans earning more, tax rates are increased to 39.6%. Both of those tax rates are now considered permanent. The Payroll Tax Holiday which lowered payments for Medicare and Social Security, was allowed to expire.
2. The Budget Control Act sequestration provision, which would have put in effect automatic spending cuts on government spending, is postponed for two months.
The debt limit was not raised as part of the debate on the fiscal cliff which means the U.S., which has hit our debt ceiling, will be mired in another debate over raising the debt limit.
Many of you helped us push Congress to understand that cutting the Pentagon budget, including nuclear weapons systems, is an essential part of any deal to reduce the deficit and should bear a higher burden than proposed cuts on basic human services. If we were to grade the fiscal cliff vote through the lens of that effort, we would have to give Congress a grade of “Incomplete.” In two months, Congress will have to decide whether they allow sequestration to take effect or whether they move to come up with a more rational and targeted solution.
This is a prime opportunity to ensure that our elected officials are hearing a steady drumbeat of support for reducing our bloated military spending. While programs like veterans’ care are essential and should be preserved, we do not need billions spent in maintaining an outdated military readiness posture that has us investing in nuclear weapons, tanks, and nuclear submarines. From our nuclear weapons budget alone, we can cut over $100 billion over the next 10 years:
- Downsizing the Trident nuclear-armed sub fleet from 14 to eight or fewer new boats and save at least $20 billion over the next decade. This would still allow the Navy to deploy the same number of strategic nuclear warheads at sea as currently planned (about 1,000).
- Using existing bombers now planned to last into the 2040s and delaying work on the new bomber program, which would save $18 billion over the next decade, according to the Pentagon.#
- Gradually cut the land based missiles.
The above reductions are reasonable steps, supported by a growing number in Congress, towards our common vision of a world free of nuclear weapons.
Comments Leave a Comment
Nuclear Famine: A Billion People at Risk
The newly generated data on the decline in agricultural production that would follow a limited, regional nuclear war in South Asia support the concern that more than one billion people would be in danger of starvation. Epidemic disease and further conflict spawned by such a famine would put additional hundreds of millions at risk. Read more »
Shock and Awe Hits Home
The military operational costs of the war in Iraq, now greater than $500 billion, have surpassed those for the entire Vietnam conflict. These escalating operational costs are alarming, yet the long-term public health costs will be much greater. Read more »
Video: Nukes, Militarism and Public Health
Interview with PSR board member Dr. Andy Kanter. Read more »
In the Spotlight
September 20, 2013
Conference: Climate Smart Southwest
Build new and fortify existing cross-cultural, community, and governmental partnerships to educate and engage community action to address the anticipated public health impacts of climate change in the Southwest, September 20-21.