Make a difference in the challenge to confront global warming and prevent nuclear war and the development and use of nuclear weapons.
Tell President Obama to abolish the Nuclear Loan Guarantee Program.
The Cold War has been over for over two decades, but the nuclear peril persists. Two thousand nuclear weapons remain on a hair trigger alert status in the United States and Russia. Although both countries have proclaimed their “de-targeting” of the other side, that step is meaningless when both sides maintain a launch-on-warning posture. On January 25, 1995, an unidentified ballistic missile was detected over the Norwegian Sea by Russia’s nuclear command center. Russian President Boris Yeltsin had only four minutes to choose whether or not to retaliate against the U.S. The missile turned out to be a Norwegian weather rocket. The Russians had been notified in advance but the message was not relayed to their nuclear weapons command center. Fortunately Yeltsin decided not to retaliate with a nuclear strike. While improved relations between the United States and Russia makes a deliberate nuclear attack a more remote possibility now than during the Cold War days, the weakening of command and control structures in the former Soviet Union has actually increased the chance of an accidental nuclear war. One sensible way to lessen nuclear danger is for Russia and the U.S to de-alert their nuclear weapons. WHAT IS DE-ALERTING? De-alerting does not mean retiring or dismantling weapons, only lengthening the time which must elapse between an order-for-launch and the actual launch. De-alerting would not compromise national security or reduce the ability of the United States to defend itself against attack. De-alerting would, however, be a vital step toward nuclear safety, and thus would increase our security. De-alerting can be done in a variety of ways, including: storing warheads separately from their delivery systems, removing guidance systems from missiles, and pinning open the switches that fire missile motors. WHY DE-ALERT? De-alerting will provide additional time for communication and diplomacy between nuclear powers in a time of crisis. De-alerting will be widely welcomed around the globe as a key step away from the nuclear abyss. Presently all the nations of the world must live with the risk that the U.S. and Russia may set off a nuclear conflagration that will bring great harm to everyone. The United Nations General Assembly has passed many resolutions which call on the nuclear weapons states to de-alert. PSR’s PRESCRIPTION De-alerting U.S. nuclear weapons would enhance U.S. and global security by reducing the possibility of an accidental nuclear war or unauthorized launch of a nuclear weapon. PSR urges the President and the Congress to work together to take immediate action to de-alert U.S. nuclear weapons and encourage Russia and other nuclear weapon states to do the same. Researcher Corner Launch-Ready Nuclear Weapons: A Threat to All Nations and Peoples Recent peer-reviewed scientific studies make it clear that the environmental consequences of virtually any nuclear war could kill hundreds of millions of people from the war zone. The detonation of only a tiny fraction of U.S. and/or Russian nuclear arsenals in conflict will gravely damage the global environment and ecosystems that support the agricultural systems which human society depends upon. Since about one-third of U.S. and Russian strategic nuclear weapons remain on high-alert, these launch-ready weapons represent a well-maintained self-destruct mechanism for most humans and many other complex forms of life. The article linked above is a piece by Dr. Steven Starr, PSR Senior Scientist, that provides analysis behind this important issue.
Reducing the Threat of Nuclear War
1995: Near Disaster Over Norway
We need you to write to President Obama now and ask him to bring us back from the brink of a conflict that neither country can afford. We ask President Obama to establish direct diplomatic engagement with Iran.
Please take a moment to contact your Representative now, asking them to sign on to Rep. Markey's letter.
This report on nuclear terrorism in the US provides detailed analysis of the medical and public health consequences of nuclear terrorism or accidents. Read more »
Inside this issue: 50 years of physician anti-nuclear advocacy; pressing for better toxics policy; next steps for the Clean Air Act; and more. Read more »
Dr. Helfand spoke in September, 2010 to an audience of University students and professors on the medical consequences of nuclear weapons and the urgent need for the United States of America to reduce the risk posed by these weapons of mass destruction. Read more »